User talk:QSO: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
It sounds like a wonderful idea to have more articles on radios. I wonder if we can attract attention from people with super-old radios to document them too, since I'm sure there isn't much on the web about some of the older stuff. [[User:Hardaker|Hardaker]] ([[User talk:Hardaker|talk]]) 05:51, 15 April 2014 (PDT) | It sounds like a wonderful idea to have more articles on radios. I wonder if we can attract attention from people with super-old radios to document them too, since I'm sure there isn't much on the web about some of the older stuff. [[User:Hardaker|Hardaker]] ([[User talk:Hardaker|talk]]) 05:51, 15 April 2014 (PDT) | ||
Yep. I saw it too. I try not to delete things until they've actually posted spam, but you're right that was clearly a spam account. Anyway, I change the captcha questions every once in a while, which stops them for quite a while. Eventually some bloke figures out the answers and writes them down or something. It's probably getting near the time to change them again. [[User:Hardaker|Hardaker]] ([[User talk:Hardaker|talk]]) 17:41, 23 September 2014 (PDT) |
Revision as of 16:41, 23 September 2014
Excellent to hear! Please fire away at documenting anything you like! Hardaker (talk) 12:00, 14 April 2014 (PDT)
It sounds like a wonderful idea to have more articles on radios. I wonder if we can attract attention from people with super-old radios to document them too, since I'm sure there isn't much on the web about some of the older stuff. Hardaker (talk) 05:51, 15 April 2014 (PDT)
Yep. I saw it too. I try not to delete things until they've actually posted spam, but you're right that was clearly a spam account. Anyway, I change the captcha questions every once in a while, which stops them for quite a while. Eventually some bloke figures out the answers and writes them down or something. It's probably getting near the time to change them again. Hardaker (talk) 17:41, 23 September 2014 (PDT)